Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ANU SIVARAMAN, MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE, JJ
THE UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
MR. RAMESHA BARIKARA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tribunal's findings on evidence (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioners' contentions on fraud (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 3. writ petitions disposed (Para 38) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Writ Petitions No.26214/2023, 26321/2023, 26349/2023 and 26494/2023 are filed challenging the common order dated 23.08.2023 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal" for short) in Original Applications No.170/00407/2022, 170/00440/2022, 170/00363/2022 and 170/00410/2022, while Writ Petition No.26482/2023 is filed challenging the order dated 09.10.2023 in O.A.No.170/284/2023.
2. The Original Applications were filed challenging the Office Memoranda dated 26.08.2022 passed by the second respondent, wherein the recruitments made through advertisement dated 01.09.2018, have been cancelled and the services of the applicants have been terminated with immediate effect.
3. The Tribunal allowed the applications and the operative portion reads as under:
"(a) The impugned orders dated 26
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
