Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
A. Alok Aradhe, S. Vishwajith Shetty, JJ
SRI RAMAKRISHNAMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SUGUNA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. combined appeals under hindu marriage act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of marriage and separation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments concerning trial court's decisions. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's observation on evidence and parties' relationships. (Para 7 , 12) |
| 5. definition and context of cruelty in marriage. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. citations and legal principles regarding separation. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. final judgment and dismissal of appeals. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record.
4. In order to substantiate their case, the appellant as well as the respondent have led their evidence before the Trial Court and also got marked certain documents in support of their case. Though the parties had led separate evidence in both the cases, since the issue involved in the cases were interconnected, the Trial Court had clubbed the cases and had disposed of the petitions by a common judgment, wherein the Trial Court has dismissed the petition filed under Section 9 of the Act and has allowed the petition filed by the respondent under Section 13 of the Act on the ground of cruelty and has passed a decree dissolving the marria
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
