Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
PUTTASWAMYGOWDA S/O SANNAMOGEGOWDA – Appellant
Versus
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER T.B.EXTENSION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial compensation was inadequate. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel were heard and records reviewed. (Para 3) |
| 3. court emphasized parity in compensation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. modified compensation was ordered. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Land bearing survey No.71/7 and 71/4 measuring 6 guntas and 11 guntas respectively situated at Kamanayakanahalli Village, Chinakurali Hobli, Pandavapura Taluk, Mandya District were proposed to be acquired for construction of Hemavathi Dam under the Notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act which culminated in passing the award by the Land Acquisition Officer fixing the market value at Rs.47,800/- per acre.
2. The reference Court enhanced the market value of the subject land at Rs.1,53,400/- against which an appeal was filed before the learned District Court. Learned District Court confirmed the award passed by the reference Court against which the present appeal is filed.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for the State and perused the records.
4. The subject land was acquired under the notification dated 11.02.2002. The co-ordinate bench of this Court in MSA No.62/2014 has fixed the market value of the lan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
