SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 18788

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT LAKSHMAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SMT SUDHAMANI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The appellants being the defendants in a Partition Suit in O.S.No.952/2010 have presented this appeal for laying a challenge to the judgment & decree dated 06.03.2014 entered by the learned Judge of Fast Track Court-II, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru whereby the suit having been decreed in terms of the plaint prayer and no share in the property is granted to them.

2. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:

(a) Respondents 1, 2 & 3 had filed the subject suit for a decree of partition & separate possession of their one-half share in the suit schedule properties. The appellants being the Defendant Nos. 5 to 11 had filed the Written Statement resisting the suit. On the basis of pleadings of the parties and the documents accompanying the same, learned Judge had framed as many as three principal issues that related to nature of the suit property, earlier partition as pleaded by these appellants and the valuation of the property for the purpose of jurisdiction &

court fee.

(b) From the side of Plaintiffs, the 2nd respondent herein being the 2nd Plaintiff in the court below got himself examined as PW-1; in his deposition as many as 24 documents came to be marked as Exhibits P-1 to P-24, of them

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top