Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
J.M.KHAZI, J
SRI. PRAKASH CHAND B S/O LATE BUDHMAL – Appellant
Versus
SRI. MANOHAR SINGH S/O LATE RANJIT SINGH – Respondent
प्रतिवादी का आरोप है कि उसने बैंक प्रबंधक के साथ साजिश रचकर एक झूठा समर्थन पत्र प्राप्त किया है और इसी कारण से बैंक को उक्त समर्थन पत्र जारी करने में इतना अधिक समय लगा। स्पष्ट है कि शिकायतकर्ता ने इस सुझाव का खंडन किया है।
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint based on dishonoured cheque with lending claim. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 9) |
| 2. arguments regarding service of notice and financial capacity. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. discussion on evidence and rebuttals regarding loan. (Para 13 , 16 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. court's reasoning leading to the final decision. (Para 28) |
| 5. final ruling on the appeal. (Para 29) |
JUDGMENT
Being aggrieved by the acquittal of respondent/accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'N.I. Act'), the complainant has challenged the order of trial Court in this appeal filed under Section 378 (4) of Cr.P.C.
2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to by their rank before the trial Court.
3. It is the case of complainant that he and accused are family friends and known to each other for the past few years. Accused was visiting the house of complainant regularly. During June 2016, accused was under the severe financial constraint and caught in debt trap due to losses in the business. Therefore, he approached the complainant and requested for hand loan of Rs.6 lakhs. Taking pity and considering the long standing relationship, complainant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
