SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 18803

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. VASANTHA – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard Sri.Deviprasad Shetty, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.Jayakumar S.Patil, the learned Senior counsel along with Sri.Sandesh T.B., the learned counsel appearing for caveator/respondent No.3.

2. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that relief is not sought against the 2nd respondent -Society as such he would submit that the notice to the 2nd respondent -Society be dispensed with.

4. Accordingly, notice to the 2nd respondent -Society is dispensed with at the risk of the petitioner. This order does not bind on the 2nd respondent -Society.

5. The petitioner who is a Director of 2nd respondent -

Society is aggrieved by the interim order granted by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in Revision Petition No.56/2023. The said Revision Petition is filed challenging the interim order passed by the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies/1st respondent on an application filed by the present petitioner to vacate the interim order granted earlier in favour of the 3rd respondent.

6. The background facts are as under:

According to the petitioner, the 3rd respondent who was a Direc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top