Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
KIRLOSKAR ELECTRIC COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks change of land use assignment. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding responsibilities of the government authorities. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the necessity of documentation. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court emphasizes interdepartmental cooperation. (Para 12) |
| 5. writ petition allowed with specified directions. (Para 15) |
ORDER
a. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the second respondent herein to furnish authenticated sketch of the lands bearing sy.no.88/b, 88p/1 and 89 of Rayanala Village, measuring 31 acres 24 guntas, to the third respondent and further direct the third respondent to issue P.T. Sheet in respect of the said lands to the second respondent as per Annexure-M;
c. Direct the respondent to pay cost of this writ petition and grant such other and further reliefs as are just.
2.2. Pursuant thereto the State of Karnataka allotted 80.27 acres of land in Survey No.88 and 8.26 acres of land in Survey No.89 and phot kharab land of 0.10 guntas in Survey No.89 of Rayanala Village, under the agreement dated 05.03.1965.
2.4. Subsequently on 01.10.1971, additional 10 acres of land in Survey No.88 of th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
