Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD, J
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION SUB REGIONAL OFFICE BANGALORE NORTH – Appellant
Versus
M/S INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to esi court's order regarding payment contributions. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. contentions raised by both parties. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court found the necessity for clear findings on worker contributions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. appeal allowed and remitted back for reconsideration. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings before the E.S.I. Court.
4. Smt. Geethadevi M.P., learned counsel appearing for the appellants has raised the following contentions:
Secondly, the ESI Court has not given any reasoning and the impugned order is passed without application of mind. The ESI Court has erred in holding that M/s.Unique Detective and Security Services (P) Ltd. has paid contribution to the employees and there is no clarity in the order as to whether the contribution paid by M/s.Unique Detective and Security Services (P) Ltd. In respect of the employees who were working in the applicant – Establishment. Hence, she sought for allowing the appeal.
Firstly, before passing the order under Section 45-A of the ESI Act, the Corporation requires to give a notice to the immediate employer, i.e, M/s.Unique Detective and Security Services (
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
