SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 21011

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KRISHNAREDDY – Appellant
Versus
EXECUTIVE ENGINER NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioners have promoted a residential layout in the land measuring 7 acres 24 guntas in Sy. No.53 of Kallukote Village, Kasaba Hobli, Sira Taluk [the subject land] and they are aggrieved by the Endorsement dated 04.03.2022 issued by the third respondent [Annexure-A]. Sri G Ravishankar, the learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri Naveen Chandrashekar, the learned Additional Government Advocate for the first respondent, as also Sri S Raju, the learned counsel for the second and third respondents, are heard for final disposal.

2. The petitioners have filed their application with the third respondent to grant revised approval for the layout developed in the subject land permitting them to form additional residential sites. The third respondent in issuing the impugned Endorsement has rejected the petitioners’ application observing that even as of the year 1996-97, the revenue records have been mutated for 152 sites and the necessary records are transferred to his office, and therefore, it would not be possible to consider the request for modified approval.

3. The petitioners are first permitted to develop the subject land into a residential layout with the orders for diver

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top