Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, J
SRI. UMESH @ UMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions filed for bail under ipc 397 (Para 1) |
| 2. allegations regarding the robbery and petitioners' defenses. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. details of the crime and identification of offenders. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. arguments regarding prior offenses and implications for bail. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER
These two petitions are preferred under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by accused Nos.1 and 3 respectively, to enlarge them on bail in a case registered at Kamakshipalya Police Station in crime No.422/2023 for the offence punishable under Section 397 of IPC.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned HCGP for the State and perused the material on record.
3. Petitioners along with another accused are alleged to have committed robbery on 07.08.2023 in the house of the complainant. It is alleged that at about 1.30 p.m. on 07.08.2023, when the complainant's son - Vijay was alone in the house, unknown persons approached him in the guise of making enquiry regarding the vacant house and barged into the house and threatening the complainant's son at knife point, snatched away three mobile phones and cash of Rs.7,000/-.
4. It is vehemently contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
