Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. Nataraj, J
SUBRAMANIYAN K S/O KONDASWAMY – Appellant
Versus
N. RAJESH KUMAR S/O N. NARENDRA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenged conviction for cheque dishonor. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. courts upheld conviction based on loan repayment evidence. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. claims of coercion and invalidity of cheque were dismissed. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. evidence supported the legitimacy of transactions leading to the cheque issuance. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
In Crl.RP.No.192/2013 The petitioner has challenged the judgment of conviction dated 05.05.2012 passed by the IV Additional I Civil Judge and JMFC, Mysuru C.C.No.159/2009, by which, she was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as 'NI Act, 1881' for short) and the consequent sentence to pay fine of Rs.19,70,000/-. She has also challenged the judgment dated 16.01.2013 passed by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-III, Mysuru in Crl.A.No.83/2012, by which, the judgment of conviction passed by the trial Court was upheld.
2. The complaint registered in C.C.No.159/2009 discloses the following; that the respondent and the petitioner were known to each other and that the petitioner availed a loan of Rs.30,00,000/- for her business. She repaid a sum of Rs.10,40,000/- but did not pa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
