Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR, J
RAHUL S/O SANGAPPA CHIMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. anticipatory bail application based on allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's reasoning on granting bail conditions. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. arguments regarding threats and investigation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. final ruling allowing anticipatory bail with conditions. (Para 7) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR)
This petition is filed by the sole accused under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure /482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, ‘the BNSS ’) seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.67/2024 of Chintaki Police Station, Aurad circle, District Bidar registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329 (3) and 74 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short, ‘the BNS’).
2. The case of the prosecution is that:
On 16.11.2024 at 01-00 p.m., when first informant was sleeping on the cot in front of her house in their land, the petitioner came there under the pretext of enquiring about a person, sat on the cot and the first informant was taken by surprise and stood up. Then, the petitioner proceeded towards her and held her hand and hugged her. The first informant screamed and thereafter, the petitioner left her. The first infor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
