- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC-K:6598
RSA No.200358 of 2017
C/W RSA No.200357 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K S HEMALEKHA
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.200358/2017 (DEC/INJ)
C/W
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.200357/2017(DEC/INJ)
RSA NO.200358 OF 2017:
BETWEEN:
MALLIKARJUN
S/O SHANTAPPA SHIRASHYAD
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
OCC: AGRICULTURE
R/O SHIVAPUR K.D.
TALUK: INDI
DIST: VIJAYAPURA
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI ANANTH S. JAHAGIRDAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
GOURABAI W/O BALAWANT HARIJAN
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK
R/O SHIVAPUR K.D.
NOW RESIDING AT LALASANGI
TALUK: INDI
DIST: VIJAYAPURA - 586209
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR KALLOOR, ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING
TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 10.08.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.45/2015 ON THE
FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT INDI,
CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.11.2015
PASSED IN O.S.NO.262/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE
Digitally signed
by SHILPA R
TENIHALLI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2023:KHC-K:6598
RSA No.200358 of 2017
C/W RSA No.200357 of 2017
AND JMFC AT INDI, AND TO PASS ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE
ORDERS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
RSA NO.200357 OF 2017:
BETWEEN:
MALLIKARJUN
S/O SHANTAPPA SHIRSHYAD
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
OCC: AGRICULTURE
R/O SHIVAPUR K.D.
TALUK :INDI
DIST: VIJAYAPURA - 586 209
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI ANANTH S. JAHAGIRADAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
GOURABAI
W/O BALAWANT HARIJAN
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK
R/O SHIVAPUR K.D.
NOW RESIDING AT LALASANGI
TALUK:INDI
DIST: VIJAYAPURA
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI AJAY KUMAR A. K., ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING
TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 10.08.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.46/2015 ON THE
FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT INDI,
CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.11.2015
PASSED IN O.S.NO.91/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC AT INDI AND TO PASS ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE
ORDERS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
- 3 -
NC: 2023:KHC-K:6598
RSA No.200358 of 2017
C/W RSA No.200357 of 2017
Both the appeals are filed by the unsuccessful
purchasers against the concurrent findings of the Courts
below.
2.
The brief facts of the case are that, two suits in
O.S.Nos.91/2009 and 262/2008 are filed for declaration
and permanent injunction.
3.
O.S.No.91/2009 is filed by the purchaser one
Mallikarjun seeking for declaration that he is the absolute
owner in possession of the suit land bearing Sy.No.84/1
measuring 3-00 acres of Shivapur KD village.
4.
O.S.No.262/2008 is filed by one Gourabai, wife
of Balawant Harijan seeking for declaration and permanent
injunction in respect of Sy.No.84 measuring 6 acres 22
guntas of Shivapur KD village, Taluka Indi.
5.
The parties herein are referred to as purchaser
– Mallikarjun and Gourabai for the sake of convenience.
- 4 -
6.
The purchaser-Mallikarjun filed O.S.No.91/2009
for declaration stating that he is the absolute owner in
possession
of
the
suit
schedule
property
bearing
Sy.No.84/1, measuring 3 acres out of Sy.No.84 which was
originally measuring 6 acres 22 guntas owned by one
Shivappa, the father of Gourabai - defendant and one
Balawwa. On the death of Shivappa, his wife Channawwa
became the absolute owner of the said property and on
her death, the mutation entry was effected in the name of
her two daughters namely, Gourabai – defendant and
Balawwa. The said Balawwa died leaving behind her
husband
Siddappa.
According
to
the
purchaser
–
Mallikarjun, Siddappa had become the absolute owner of
the property after the death of Balawwa and by way of a
wardi for partition in Sy.No.84, 3 acres was allotted to
Siddappa and remaining 3 acres 22 guntas was allotted to
Gourabai – defendant. Accordingly, watani dairy No.23
was certified. It is stated that Siddappa sold his share to
the extent of 3 acres to the purchaser – Mallikarjun due to
his financial difficulties and the purchaser purchased the
- 5 -
property through a registered sale deed 07.01.2008 for a
valuable consideration of Rs.93,000/- and he is a bona fide
purchaser.
7.
The plaintiff in O.S.No.262/2008, Gourabai
contended that she is the absolute owner of the suit
schedule property as the suit schedule property is
inherited from her father Shivappa and on his death,
Channawwa-the mother of Gourabai and Balawwa became
the absolute owner of the said property and she died
leaving
behind
two
daughters
namely
Gourabai
-
defendant and Balawwa as the owners of the property and
the mutation entry came to be effected. Thereafter,
Balawwa died issueless and the suit property was the
Stridhana property, by way of succession to Balawwa and
since Balawwa died issueless, after her death, the property
reverts back to the parental descendants and the
defendant – Gourabai has become the absolute owner of
the suit schedule property and Siddappa has no right, title
or interest over the suit schedule property, to create a sale
- 6 -
deed in favour of said Mallikarjun and the said sale deed is
without the knowledge of the said Gourabai and as such,
the suit for declaration and permanent injunction against
Siddappa and Mallikarjun.
8.
The defendant- Gourabai in O.S.No.91/2009
and
defendants
-
Siddappa
and
Malliarjun
in
O.S.No.262/2008 resisted the claims by filing written
statement.
9.
The trial Court on the basis of the pleadings,
framed the following issues in both the suits:
“Issues framed in O.S.No.91/2009:
1. Whether the plaintiff proves that, he is the
owner of suit property by virtue of the sale
deed dated -1-2008?
2.
Whether
the plaintiff proves
that,
the
defendant without any right or interest is
trespassing into the suit land, trying to cut
the valuable trees and bushes and thereby
causing obstruction to the plaintiff’s lawful
possession of the suit land?
- 7 -
3. Whether the defendant proves that, she is the
only sole owner to the suit land bearing
Bl.No.84 measuring 6 acres 22 gunthas as it
is Stridhan property of her mother?
4. Whether the defendant proves that, the suit of
the plaintiff is not maintainable as there are
already O
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.