2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 3956
- 1 -
CRL.RP No. 852 of 2023
NC: 2023:KHC:42537
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.852 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI N HANUMANTHARAYA
S/O D S NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
R/O PAVAN NILAYA,
SARASWATHIPURA
SIDDARTHA COLLEGE ROAD
TUMAKURU - 570 009
2.
SRI. M.V.KRISHNAPPA
S/O LATE CHINNA VENKATARAMANA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
R/AT NO.553, PRASHANTHI NILAYA,
MARUTHI FARM HOUSE,
AMRUTHA NAGARA,
BENGALURU - 560 092
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SRINATHA B V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
MALUR POLICE
KOLAR DISTRICT
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS
BENGALURU - 560 001
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP)
Digitally signed
by MADHURI S
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
- 2 -
CRL.RP No. 852 of 2023
NC: 2023:KHC:42537
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF
CR.P.C PRAYING TO a) SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
27.02.2023 PASSED IN CRL.RP.NO.52/2020 ON THE FILE OF
THE I ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE AT KOLAR; b) PASS ANY OTHER
ORDER / S AS DEEMS FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES
OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
In this petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of
Cr.P.C, petitioners who are arraigned as accused Nos.11 and
12 have challenged order dated 27.02.2023 passed in
Crl.R.P.No.52/2020 on the file of I Addl.Sessions Judge,
Kolar, reversing their discharge by the trial Court for the
offences punishable under Sections 409, 465, 468, 471, 420
r/w Section 34 IPC.
For the sake of convenience, the parties are
referred to by their rank before the trial Court.
3.
In support of the petition, accused Nos.11 and 12
have contended that they are working as a Deputy Treasury
Officer and First Division Assistant in Sub-treasury, Malur.
The allegations against them are that without proper
- 3 -
verification they have passed the bills and thereby facilitated
misappropriation by other accused. Since accused Nos.11
and 12 are Government employees, as per Section 197
Cr.P.C, sanction is necessary. However, in the present case
cognizance is taken without there being any sanction ordered
by the Government. As per the charge sheet, there is lapse
or negligence on their part in issuing the cheques by passing
DC
bills.
There
are
no
allegations
that
they
have
misappropriated the amount. The Sessions Court has
committed error in setting aside the order passed by the
Magistrate. It is a fit case for interference by this Court and
prays to allow the petition, set aside the order of the
Sessions Court and restore the order of the learned
Magistrate.
4.
Learned
High
Court
Government
Pleader
supported the impugned order passed by the Sessions Court
and submitted that as evident from the charge sheet, in their
capacity as the Deputy treasury Officer and First Division
Assistant,
accused
Nos.11
and
12
have
facilitated
misappropriation to the tune of Rs.1,49,88,817/- by the
- 4 -
other accused and there is prima facie material to proceed
against them. Under the guise of discharge of public duty,
accused have committed the offences alleged and such being
the case the safeguard of Section 197 Cr.P.C is not available
to them and prays to reject the petition.
5.
Heard arguments of both sides and perused on
record.
6.
CID Bengaluru has filed a charge sheet against
accused Nos.1 to 15 for the offences punishable under
Sections 409, 465, 468, 471, 420 r/w Section 34 IPC. At the
relevant point of time, accused No.1 was working as
Executive Officer, accused No.2 as Manager, accused No.3 as
Auditor, accused No.4 as First Division Assistant, accused
No.5 and accused No.6 as Junior Engineers, accused No.7 as
Second Division Assistant at Taluk Panchayath, Malur.
Accused No.8 was working as Secretary of Madiwala Gram
Panchayath, Malur Taluk, accused No.9 was working as
Manager, BCM hostel, Devalapura. Accused No.10 was
working as Deputy Secretary and accused No.15 was
working as Chief Accounts Officer at Zilla Panchayath, Kolar.
- 5 -
Accused No.11 was working as Sub Treasury Officer, accused
No.12 as First Division Assistant, accused No.13 as Second
Division Assistant, accused No.14 as Second Division
Assistant at Sub Treasury Malur. Accused No.15 was working
as Chief Accounts Officer.
7.
It is alleged that during the year 2001-2002 and
2002-2003, accused No.1 was the Executive Officer, accused
No.2 was managing the branch and the cash register of Staff
section (Sibbandi shake), accused No.3 was incharge of
budget release and housing scheme, accused No.4 was in
charge of Budget grant, stamp fee and was also incharge of
11th Finance Scheme of Taluk Panchayath, accused Nos.5
and 6 were over all incharge and maintenance of the
Projects pertaining to the Taluk Panchayath. Accused No.7
was dealing with the 10th Finance Scheme, Ambedkar
Branch, Ashraya Samithi etc., and accused No.8 was
Secretary and in charge of appeals and other files of Malur
Grama Panchayath. All these accused have tampered DC
bills pertaining to several schemes, failed to note the exact
measurement of the work carried out with an intention to
- 6 -
draw excess amount from the treasury and DC b