- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:38799-DB
WA No. 909 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
WRIT APPEAL NO. 909 OF 2023 (EDN-RES)
BETWEEN:
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560 041.
REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR EVALUATION
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. GIRISHKUMAR R.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
DR HAROON ADONI,
S/O LATE KHAJAMOINUDDIN,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
R/AT NO FLAT NO 302, SAHARA RESIDENCY,
3RD FLOOR, MODEL COLONY, AMBEDKAR NAGAR,
YASHAVANATHPURA, BANGALORE 560 022.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT.SUMANA BALIGA.,ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO A) SET-ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 11/04/2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU IN W.P.
4448/2023 AND B) PASS ANY SUCH ORDERS AS THIS HONBLE
COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICES AND
EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Digitally signed
by SHARADA
VANI B
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2023:KHC:38799-DB
WA No. 909 of 2023
This intra-court appeal seeks to lay a challenge to a
learned Single Judge's order dated 11.04.2023 whereby
the respondent’s W.P.No.4448/2023 has been allowed.
The operative portion of the order reads as under:-
“(2) The writ of mandamus is issued directing the
respondent-University to round off the marks obtained
by the petitioner in Paper–I at 51.25 % to 52% and
Paper-II at 45.25% to 46% in the examination of the
discipline of MD Pathology (RS-3) conducted November
2022 by them. Further, to round off the total average
marks to 199 instead of 197 out of 400 secured by the
petitioner, then in total the average marks of 49.75% to
50%.”
2.
Learned
panel
counsel
appearing
for
the
appellant vehemently argues that the ordinance dated
29.03.2019 which governs valuation of answer scripts
inter alia in P.G. courses provides for rounding off the
marks to the next nearest decimal unit, is only as a One
Time Measure; and therefore, learned Single Judge is not
justified in issuing the mandamus of the kind. In support
of his submission, he relied upon a decision of the Apex
Court
in
RAJIV
GANDHI
UNIVERSITY
OF
HEALTH
SCIENCES, BANGALORE VS. G.HEMLATHA AND OTHERS,
(2012) 8 SCC 568.
- 3 -
3.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties
and having perused the appeal papers, we decline
indulgence in the matter broadly agreeing with the
reasoning of learned Single Judge. Clause 4 of the subject
Ordinance reads as under:-
“4. Procedure for General Valuation:
a. All answer scripts of Post graduate
including
PG-Diploma
and
super
specialty
courses in Medical/Dental/Homeopathy shall be
subjected to Digital Valuation as prescribed by
RGUHS. The average of the total marks awarded
by the four valuation of the paper, which is
rounded off to the nearest value, shall be
considered for computation of the results.
b. All answer scripts of Post graduate
including PG-Diploma courses in PG-Allied Health
Sciences,
PG-Ayurveda,
PG-Nursing,
PG-
Pharmacy, PG-Unani, PG-Yoga and Naturopathy,
Masters in Physiotherapy, MGA and MPH, shall be
subjected to Digital Valuation as prescribed by
RGUHS. The average of the total marks awarded
by the two valuators for the paper which is
rounded off to the nearest value, shall be
considered for computation of the results.
The
marks
awarded
and
the
results
declared after general valuation shall be the final
and under no circumstances further valuation
shall be entertained.”
The text of the above provision in unmistakable terms
provides for the marks being rounded off to the nearest
- 4 -
value for the purpose of computation of the results of the
candidate concern.
4.
The second submission of the learned panel
counsel appearing for the University that the subject
provision of the Ordinance in question provides for
rounding off, of the marks to the nearest full value only as
a One Time Measure is not supported by the text and the
language of the said provision. There is nothing indicative
of such an intent. The University in support of such a
stand cannot much bank upon the Corrigendum dated
17.11.2020 issued by the Vice Chancellor which mentions
the Covid-19 Pandemic situation in support thereof. The
relevant part of the Corrigendum is reproduced below:
Subject
No.
Existing
Shall be read as
153(Mum)
/06
In
view
of
the
prevailing
Covid-19
situation,
it
was
recommended
to
implement
the
Hon’ble
High
Court
direction
regarding
Writ
Petition
No.11348
of
2020
(EDN-RES) as a one
time measure
In view of the prevailing Covid-19
situation, it was recommended to
implement the Hon’ble High Court
direction regarding Writ Petition
No.11348 of 2020 (EDN-RES) as a
one
time
measure
and
the
following decision taken:
1. This is one time measure will
be applicable for he candidates
who all fall short of one mark in
theory for declaring as Pass after
the computation of result with the
existing university ordinances.
- 5 -
5.
The reasons for this Corrigendum not coming to
the aid of the University are not far to seek: Firstly, the
text
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.