Heard Sri S.G.Rajendra Reddy, learned counsel

for the petitioner.

3

2.

The

petitioners

feeling

aggrieved

dissatisfied with the impugned order of framing charge

by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge,

Davanagere in SC No.60/2012 against the petitioners

for the offences punishable under Section 307, 504,

324, 326, 506, 354 read with Section 149 of IPC, have

preferred this Revision Petition under Section 397 of

Cr.PC.

3. Parties to this revision petition are referred to

as per their ranking before the trial Court for the

purpose of convenience.

4. The said Sessions Case No.60/2012 arose out

of a private complaint filed by the complainant under

Section 200 of Cr.PC. against the petitioners for the

offences punishable under Sections 307, 504, 324,

326, 506, 354 read with Section 149 of IPC.

4

5. The learned jurisdictional Magistrate, on filing

of the complaint took cognizance of the offences

recorded the sworn statement. Having satisfied with

the prima facie case, issued process against the

accused persons. The accused persons appeared

before the Jurisdictional Magistrate and were enlarged

on bail. The offences so alleged against the accused

persons as are triable by the S