2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 3168
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION No.57351/2015 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI MOHAMMED WAZIR BAIG
S/O. LATE ANWAR BAIG,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/O. 80/1, 6TH CROSS,
HANIFA MASJID KUSHALNAGAR,
BENGALURU – 45.
2.
KALEEM PASHA
S/O. AMANULLA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/O. NO.287/10, 17TH CROSS,
DEVARAJURSNAGAR,
BENGALURU – 26.
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI HARISH KUMAR M.S., ADVOCATE (V.C.))
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINICIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF MINORITIES,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU – 560 001.
2.
SRI QAMRUL ISLAM
MINISTER OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION,
MINORITY WELFARE AND WAKFS,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
- 2 -
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU – 560 001.
(R-2 IS DELETED V/O. DATED 13/01/2023)
3.
DR. SYED SHAW KHUSRO HUSSAINEE
SAJJADA NASHEEN
DARGA HAZARATH KHAWAJA BANDE NAWAZ,
GULBARGA – 585 101.
4.
ABDUL RIYAZ KHAN
EX-CHAIRMAN OF KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF
WAKF,
ADVOCALI, HAMEED SHAW COMPLEX,
CUBBONPET,
BANGALORE – 01.
(R-3 AND R-4 ARE IMPLEADED AS
PER THE ORDER DATED 07.03.2017)
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K.S. ARUN, HCGP FOR R-1 (MA NOT FILED);
R-2 IS DELETED V/O. DATED 13/01/2023;
SRI MAHMOOD PATEL AND SMT. FATHIMA ZOHRA,
ADVOCATES FOR R-3 (JOINT VK FILED);
SRI USMAN, ADVOCATE FOR R-4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE ORDER/ENDORSEMENT DATED 23.11.2015
PASSED
BY
THE
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
MINORITY
WELFARE, HAJ & WAKF DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF
KARNATAKA BY R-1, VIDE ANNEXURE-E.
THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND
RESERVED ON 27/01/2023 FOR ORDERS AND COMING FOR
PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER THIS DAY, THE COURT
PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:
- 3 -
The petitioners in this writ petition are assailing
the order/endorsement bearing No.MWD/453/WES/
2013 dated 23/11/2015 (Annexure-E), passed by the
Principal Secretary, Minority Welfare, Haj & Waqf
Department-respondent No.1 and sought to allow the
application dated 28/11/2013 (Annexure – A) filed by
the
petitioners
seeking
permission
to
prosecute
respondent No.3 - Dr. Syed Shah Khusro Hussaini, who
was the sitting member and R.Abdul Riyaz Khan –
respondent No.4.
Brief facts leading to filing of this writ
petition are:
Petitioners in this writ petition seek permission to
prosecute respondent Nos.1 and 2, who were the sitting
member and Chairman respectively of the Karnataka
State Board of Waqf for having mortgaged the waqf
property i.e., land measuring 7 acres in Sy.No.34,
Brahmapura Village, Kalaburagi, (hereinafter referred
- 4 -
to
as
“the
petition
property”
for
the
sake
of
convenience) by corrupt practice.
It is averred in the petition that the petition
property belongs to Dargah Hazarath Khaja Bande
Nawaz, (hereinafter referred to as “Waqf institution”)
registered under the Karnataka State Board of Waqf
Act, 1959 (“the Waqf Act” for short). It is averred that
the Khaja Education Society Gulbarga (“the Society” for
short) was established by Sajjadanasheen of Dargah
Hazrath Khwaja Bande Nawaz under the provision of
the Societies Registration Act, 1960 (“Registration Act”
for short). The management and administration of the
said waqf and its property is vested with the mutawalli
and Sajjadanasheen Ali Jana and the Society has its
registered office in the land belonging to the waqf
where Sajjadanasheen is the president of the Society.
It is averred that the land was leased out by the waqf
to the Society for a period of 33 years and continues to
occupy the property as a lawful tenant. It is further
- 5 -
stated that the Society is engaged in imparting
education in various fields to the poor and had
proposed to establish a general and teaching hospital in
the name of Khaja Bande Nawaz by constructing a huge
building on the land.
This being so, the Society felt necessary to
take financial assistance from the bank in order to
complete the building/project and proposed to raise a
loan to the tune of Rs.12.00 crores from the
nationalized bank and the bank insisted for security of
property on which the proposed work will take place, as
such, the Sajjadanasheen requested the Waqf Board to
grant permission to mortgage the land and the matter
was placed before the Board in its meeting and “No
Objection Certificate” (“NOC”) was issued granting
permission to mortgage the property. Subsequently, a
letter was addressed by the Deputy General Manager of
State Bank of Hyderabad, Gulbarga not to release the
loan amount since “NOC” was not yet approved by the
- 6 -
Board. In the meanwhile, it appeared that the legal
opinion was sought from the advocate who had an
opined that the lessee of the waqf property had no right
to mortgage the waqf property or seek permission
under Section 51 read with Rule 44 of the Waqf Act. It
is further averred that ignoring the legal opinion, the
then administrator in clear violation of Section 51 of the
Waqf Act had proceeded to approve the proposal to
grant loan on a condition that the building so
constructed shall be registered as an additional waqf
property and the Society availed the loan mortgaging
the waqf property belonging to the Dargah Hazarath
Khaja Bande Nawaz i.e., the waqf institution.
5.
Per contra, learned High Court Government
Pleader appearing for respondent No.1 would submit
that the petition in the present form is not maintainable
either in law or on facts and sought to dismiss the writ
petition. It is stated that the power of leasing the waqf
property is the discretionary power of the Waqf Board
- 7 -
and the petition property belongs to the waqf, which is
registered under the Waqf Act and it has been leased
out to the Society called “Khaja Education Society”
Kalaburagi, which ru