2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 5476
- 1 -
MFA No. 104398 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
MISC. FIRST APPEAL NO. 104398 OF 2022 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
GANGADARAYYA SANGAYYA KOTIMATH
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
1.
SMT. SUMANGALADEVI W/O GANGADARAYYA
KOTIMATH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. KOTIMATH
PETABANA 582116, TQ. LAXMESHWAR,
DIST.GADAG.
2.
SHIVAPRASAD S/O GANGADARAYYA
KOTIMATH, AGE. 49 YEARS,
OCC. PRIVATE WORK,
R/O. KOTIMATH PETABANA-582116,
TQ. LAXMESHWAR, DIST. GADAG.
3.
SMT. SHRIDEVI D/O GANGADARAYYA
KOTIMATH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. KOTIMATH
PETABANA 582116, TQ. LAXMESHWAR,
DIST. GADAG.
4.
SMT. CHAITANYADEVI D/O GANGADARAYYA
KOTIMATH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. KOTIMATH
PETABANA-582116, TQ. LAXMESHWAR,
DIST. GADAG.
- 2 -
MFA No. 104398 of 2022
5.
MAHESHWARI D/O GANGADARAYYA KOTIMATH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/O. KOTIMATH PETABANA-582116,
TQ. LAXMESHWAR, DIST. GADAG.
6.
CHANNAVEERAYYA SHADKSHARAYYA
KOTIMATH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSE HOLD,
R/O.LAXMESHWAR-582116,
TALUK SHIRAHATTI, DSIT. GADAG.
7.
NANDAYYA SHANKRAYYA KOTIMATH
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/O. LAXMESHWAR-582116,
TALUK: SHIRAHATTI, DIST: GADAG.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. D. J. NAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
GADAG.
BASAVARAJ GOOLAPPA UPNAL (DEAD) BY LRS.
2.
SMT. PARVATI W/O BASAVARAJ UPANAL
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/O. LAXMESHWAR-582116, TQ. LAXMESHWAR,
DIST. GADAG.
3.
RAMESH S/O BASAVARAJ UPANAL
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/O. LAXMESHWAR-582116,
TALUK. LAXMESHWAR, DIST. GADAG.
- 3 -
MFA No. 104398 of 2022
4.
SMT. NANDA W/O CHANNAPPA
DHARMAYATTA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSE HOLD, R/O. LAXMESHWAR-582116,
TALUK. LAXMESHWAR, DIST. GADAG.
5.
MAHESH S/O BASAVARAJ UPANAL
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULURE
AND BUSINESS, R/O. LAXMESHWAR-582116,
TALUK. LAXMESHWAR, DIST. GADAG.
6.
PRAKASH GOOLAPPA UPANAL
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. PRIVAE WORK,
R/O. LAXMESHWAR-582116,
TALUK. SHIRAHATTI, DIST. GADAG.
7.
PULAKESHI GOOLAPPA UPANAL
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE WORK,
R/O. LAXMESHWAR-582116,
TALUK. SHIRAHATTI, DIST. GADAG.
8.
SOMESH JAGADISH UPANAL
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE HOLD,
R/O. LAXMESHWAR-582116,
TALUK. SHIRAHATTI, DIST. GADAG.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI LAXMANA T.MANTAGANI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R6 & R8:
SHRI S.S.PATIL, ADVOCATE AND
SHRI MAHANTESH R.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R7:
AGA FOR R1)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/SEC.54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION
ACT, 1894, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
26.09.2022 PASSED IN LAC.NO.1/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST
CLASS, LAXMESHWAR, AWARDING THE COMPENSATION OF
RS.12,20,184/- TO APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 7.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
- 4 -
MFA No. 104398 of 2022
Though this matter is listed for hearing on
interlocutory application for vacating stay and for
admission,
with
consent
of
learned
counsel
for
parties, it was heard and taken up for final disposal.
Challenging order dated 26.09.2022 passed
by
Senior
Civil
Judge
&
JMFC.,
Laxmeshwar
in
LAC.no.1/2018, this appeal is filed.
Appellants
no.1
to
5
herein
-
legal
representatives of deceased respondent no.5, joined
by respondents no.6 and 7 (would be collectively
referred to as ‘appellants’); while respondents no.1
herein was petitioner no.1 and respondents no.2 to 5
herein were petitioners no.2 to 5 (collectively referred
to as ‘respondents’) after being transposed from
respondents no.1 to 4 as petitioners no.2 to 5, before
Reference Court.
Brief facts as stated are that land measuring
no.2033.61 sq.ft. out of CTS no.5239 of Petaban
village,
(hereinafter
referred
to
as
‘acquired
- 5 -
property’ for short) was acquired by SLAO and
Assistant
Commissioner,
Gadag,
for
purpose
of
widening of Lakshmeshwar NH-73. Said proceedings
ended in drawing of consent award for Rs.12,20,184/-
in favour name of Upanal Goolappa Fakkirappa. After
objections
were
filed
by
respondent
no.5
-
Gangadharaiah Sangaiah Kotimath and noting rival
claims for compensation, matter was referred to Civil
Court under Section 30 and 31 of Land Acquisition Act.
Aggrieved
by
impugned
order
passed
in
said
proceedings rejecting claims of appellants, this appeal
is filed.
Sri D.J.Naik, learned counsel for appellants
submitted that in year 1950, appellant’s grandfather
Shivanandaiah Kotimath (hereinafter referred to as
‘Kotimath’ for short) sold extent of 38 guntas 2 annas
comprised
in
Sy.no.86/2B/1A
and
86/2B/1A/2
of
Petaban village totally measuring 38 guntas in favour
of Malleshappa Fakkirappa Mahantshettar (hereinafter
referred to as ‘Mahantshettar’ for short). It was
submitted that thereafter said Mahantshettar sold
- 6 -
same to Ramappa Bharamappa Mulgund (hereinafter
referred to as ‘Mulgund’ for short) and Goolappa
Fakkirappa
Upanal
(hereinafter
referred
to
as
‘Goolappa’ for short) under registered sale deed
dated 28.12.1959. However, purchasers concocted
sale deed dated 06.09.1980 showing that they had
purchased land measuring 17 guntas 2.3/4 annas of
suit property. Claiming said land said to have got
converted
for
non-agricultural
purposes
and
CTS
no.5239 is formed out of said land, laid claim for
compensation in respect of suit property. It was
submitted that land bearing CTS no.5239 totally
measuring 31 guntas 2.3/9 annas continues to be
agricultural
land.
Therefore
same
was
not
one
belonging to respondents. Therefore appellants were
entitled
for
compensation.
But
without
proper
consideration of above facts, reference Court passed
impugned order. Therefore, same requires to be set
aside.
On other hand, Sri S.S. Patil and Mahantesh
R Patil, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.7
- 7 -
and
Sri
Laxman
T.
Mantagani,
learned
counsel
appearing for respondents no.2 to 6 and 8 submit that
land bearing Sy.no.86 of Petaban village originally
measuring 2 acres 20 guntas was purchased by P.T.
Manvi and brothers (hereinafter referred to as ‘Manvi
brothers’ for short) and grandfather of appellants of
Shivanandayya
Kotimath
jointly
under
sale
deed
dated 15.12.1971 from one Laxman Lingu Kulkarni,
it’s earlier owner. Out of total extent of 2 acres 20
guntas,
5
guntas
was
gifted
to
Municipality
for
formation of road. Remaining 2 acres 15 guntas was
partitioned between Kotimath and Manvi brothers,
wherein extent of 1 acre 9 guntas was allotted to
share of Kotimath and 1 acre 6 guntas was retained by
Manvi
brothers.
Said
partition
of
year
1949
is
evidenced by Ex.P.32 M.E.s no.199, 200 and 201.
Thereafter Kotimath sold an extent of 8 guntas to
Manvi brothers. Thus extent retained by Kotimath was
1
Acre
1
guntas.
Thus,
Sy.no.86
came
to
be
renumbered as 86/1, 86/2A and 86/2/1 respectively.
Thereafter
under
sale
deed
dated
25.03.1950,
- 8 -
Kotimath along wi