SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 2610

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC:36174

WP No. 18157 of 2023

C/W WP No. 2664 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

WRIT PETITION NO. 18157 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)

C/W

WRIT PETITION NO. 2664 OF 2023 (LB-RES)

IN W.P.NO.18157/2023

BETWEEN:

M/S. KRISHNA ROYALE APARTMENT OWNERS

ASSOCIATION,

KRISHNA ROYALE APARTMENT,

SY NO. 19/3, SITE NO. 4 AND 5,

BBMP KATHA NO. 2370/97,

MUNNEKOLALU VILLAGE, VARTHUR MAIN ROAD,

MARATHAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 037.

AS SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE

KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 1960

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

MR. SHAILESH JAGANATH RAO.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. GIRISH K. V., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

REVENUE DEPARTMENT,

M. S. BUILDING,

DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

BENGALURU - 560 001.

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

Digitally signed

by REKHA

ANKAIAH

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2023:KHC:36174

WP No. 18157 of 2023

C/W WP No. 2664 of 2023

2.

TAHSILDAR,

BENGALURU EAST,

K. R. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 016.

3.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT,

KANDAYA BHAVAN, K. G. ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 009.

4.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION,

KANDAYA BHAVAN, K. G. ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 009.

5.

THE COMMISSIONER,

BBMP, N. R. SQUARE, JC ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 002.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. C.N. MAHADESHWARAN, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;

SRI. N.R. JAGADEESHWARA, ADVOCATE FOR R5)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE COSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 31ST OCTOBER 2022 BEARING

NO.DMA(N.C.R)C.R:32/2022-23 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 104

OF KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 BY R2 WHICH IS

PRODUCED HERETO AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

IN W.P.NO.2664/2023

BETWEEN:

1.

M. K. THYAGARAJU,

S/O LATE M. T. KRISHNA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.653 FERNS PARADISE,

- 3 -

NC: 2023:KHC:36174

WP No. 18157 of 2023

C/W WP No. 2664 of 2023

DODDANEKKUNDI, OUTER RING ROAD

MARATHAHALLI,

BENGALURU - 560 037.

2.

M. K. AMARNARAYANA,

S/O LATE M. T. KRISHNA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.330 FERNS CITY,

DODDANEKKUNDI, OUTER RING ROAD

MARATHAHALLI,

BENGALURU - 560 037.

3.

M. K. LOKESH,

S/O LATE M. T. KRISHNA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.401 KRISHNA DHAM,

OUTER RING ROAD, MARATHAHALLI,

BENGALURU - 560 037.

4.

M. K. KODANDARAM,

S/O LATE M. T. KRISHNA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.2/1,

DAMODARA MUDALIAR STREET,

1ST CROSS, ULSOOR

BENGALURU - 560 008.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. P. B. RAJU, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA,

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

VIDHANA SOUDHA,

DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

BANGALORE - 560 002.

- 4 -

NC: 2023:KHC:36174

WP No. 18157 of 2023

C/W WP No. 2664 of 2023

REPRESENTED BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT,

KANDAYA BHAVAN, K. G. ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 009.

3.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION,

KANDAYA BHAVAN, K. G. ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 009.

4.

THE TAHSILDAR,

BENGALURU EAST,

K. R. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 016.

5.

THE COMMISSIONER,

BBMP, N. R. SQUARE,

JC ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. C.N. MAHADESHWARAN, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;

SRI. N.R. JAGADEESHWARA, ADVOCATE FOR R5)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

NOTICE

DATED

31.10.2022

BEARING

NO.DMA(N.C.R)

C.R:32/2022-23 ISSUED BY THE R4 - TAHSILDAR VIDE

ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

- 5 -

NC: 2023:KHC:36174

WP No. 18157 of 2023

C/W WP No. 2664 of 2023

The

petitioner

in

W.P.No.18157/2023

is

M/s. Krishna Royale Apartment Owners Association and

has challenged the notice at Annexure-'A' issued by the

Tahsildar dated 31.10.2022 under Section 104 of the

Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short ‘the Act’). It

is submitted that the virtue of the sketch prepared by the

Taluk Surveyor, it appears that there is encroachment of

Government land in Sy.No.19/1 of Munekolalu Village,

Varthur Hobli. The said notice states that there is

encroachment of the ‘Kaluve’.

In W.P.No.2664/2023, the land owners have

challenged with respect to the portion retained by the land

owners in Sy.No.19/3 of Munekolalu Village, Varthur Hobli,

Bengaluru East Taluk, whereby they have challenged the

notice at Annexure-'A' issued by the Tahsildar under

Section 104 of the Act dated 31.10.2022, whereby the

notice makes out the case of encroachment of the ‘Kaluve

Land’. As the subject matter of dispute relates to the

- 6 -

adjacent land and the assertion made in the notices are

identical, both the Writ Petitions are taken up together and

disposed off by a common order.

Learned Additional Government Advocate fairly

submits that the Tahsildar has no jurisdiction to issue

notices under Section 104 of the Act in the present case,

as the present dispute relates to alleged encroachment of

‘Kaluve’. It is submitted that insofar as encroachment of

‘Kaluve’ is concerned, the appropriate enquiry is to be

made under Section 67(2) of the Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners in both the

matters would further draw attention to the survey sketch

at Annexure-K in W.P.No.2664/2023 and submit that the

notice of the Tahsildar is based on the sketch prepared

which demarcates the encroachment. But, however such

sketch has been prepared in the absence of the petitioners

and accordingly, even if the proceedings are initiated by

the respondent authorities afresh, if they base it on the

- 7 -

sketch at Annexure-'K' in W.P.No.2664/2023, it would

result in injustice caused to them. Accordingly, it is prayed

that the survey be prepared afresh in the presence of the

petitioners in both the Writ Petitions and on the basis of

the sketch prepared in such survey after notice to the

petitioners in both the matters, the proceedings as per law

may be permitted to be proceeded.

After hearing both sides in both the matters, in

light of the stand of the AGA, the notices at Annexure-'A'

are set aside.

6.

However insofar as further action to be taken, it

is ordered as follows:

(a) Survey be conducted in presence of the

petitioners in both the matters, wherein the

sketch to be prepared demarcating the

encroachment if any.

(b) Subsequently, once the survey process is

completed,

it

is

upon

the

Deputy

- 8 -

Commissioner to take proceedings in terms

of Section 67(2) of the Act and follow the

procedure therein. Needless to state, upon

conclusion of the said enquiry, the petitioners

are at liberty to seek redressal, if they agree

in terms of Section 67(3) of the Act.

(c) The identification of the ‘Kaluve’ is to be

done on the basis of the records maintained

by the Assistant Director of Land Records.

Copy of the documents to be shared with the

petitioners.

(d) The BBMP also to be notified at the time of

survey.

7.

Accordingly, the petitions are disposed off.

Sd/-

JUDGE

MCR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top