PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
K RAVISHANKAR – Appellant
Versus
M KRISHNAPPA – Respondent
Challenging impugned order dated 26.08.2022 passed by
Senior Civil Judge, JMFC., Sira, in E.P.no.1/2022, these appeals are
filed.
2.
Appellant in MFA no.6126/2022 was respondent no.1,
while appellant in MFA no.6685/2022 was respondent no.2 in
E.P.no.1/2022. Respondent no.1 in both appeals herein was
petitioner and respondents no.2 to 14 herein were respondents
no.2 to 14 in E.P.no.1/2022 respectively. For sake of convenience,
they will hereinafter be referred to as per their ranks in election
petition.
3.
E.P.no.1/2022 was filed by Sri M. Krishnappa (Petitioner)
under Sections 21 and 23 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964
(hereinafter referred to as ‘KM Act’), read with Rule 69 of
Karnataka Municipalities Rules, 1977 (for short 'KM Rules'), for
following reliefs:
a)
declare
candidature
of
respondent
no.1
(Sri K. Ravishankar) in respect of ward no.9 of
City Municipal Council, Sira, as null and void
and not in accordance with KM Act and Rules;
and
9
b)
direct respondent authorities to hold election
to ward no.9 of City Muncipal Council afresh
etc.
4.
In petition, it was stated that as per directions of
respondent no.9 – Government of Karnataka, respondent no.13 -
Karnataka State
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.