HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
SMT V K BHARATHI – Appellant
Versus
SMT V GAYATHRIDEVI – Respondent
Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that
respondent No.1-complainant is no more. Submission is placed
on record.
2.
Respondent No.1 had filed a private compliant under
Section 200 of Cr.P.C., alleging that the accused created an
agreement of sale dated 6.11.2008 by forging her signature and
also executed two registered sale deeds before the Sub-Registrar
concerned by impersonation. The complainant to substantiate
the allegations filed a sworn affidavit reiterating the contents of
the complaint.
3.
The learned Magistrate on the basis of the complaint
averments, the sworn affidavit and certified copy of the
agreement of sale dated 6.11.2008 and also the sale deed dated
5
6.11.2008 passed an order holding that, the complainant has
made out a prima facie case to register the case against the
accused and accordingly registered the case against the accused
for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 418, 419, 420,
421, 423, 424, 465, 466, 467, 468,469,471 and Sec.195,
195(A), 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 204 and 506 (B) of IPC.
Taking exception to the same, accused No.2 is before this Court.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
cognizance taken by the lear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.