ORAL ORDER

Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the Suspension Notice dated 09.11.2024 issued by the 3rd respondent, whereby the petitioner has been restrained from utilizing the facilities of the club. The 3rd respondent is a Society duly registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, and the impugned Suspension Notice has been issued by invoking Rule 22(A) of the Club Byelaws.

3. The petitioner contends that the impugned notice is arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice. However, it is important to note that the 3rd respondent, being a registered society, is governed by its byelaws and internal regulations, and the issuance of the suspension notice falls within the domain of its internal management and disciplinary proceedings.

4. It is a well-settled legal principle that unless there is a violation of any statutory provision or infringement of fundamental rights, this Court, while exercising its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot interfere in the internal affairs of societies or private bodies.

5.