HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
DR. DHARMASAI – Appellant
Versus
B H RAMACHANDRA – Respondent
The respondent has filed a private complaint under
Section 200 of Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable under
Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that the
cheque which was issued by accused No.1 towards legal
enforceable
debt
when
presented
for
realisation
was
dishonoured for want of funds.
2.
The learned Magistrate after recording the sworn
statement took cognizance of the aforesaid offence and issued
summons to the petitioner-accused No.3. Taking exception of
the same, petitioner-accused No.3 is before this Court.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-
accused No.3 makes the following submissions:
3
a)
Cognizance taken by the learned Magistrate is
without territorial jurisdiction, since the cheque was presented
by the complainant through his banker at branch situated in
Bangalore and the complaint was filed before the learned
Magistrate at Thirthahalli and the same is not maintainable as
specified under Section 142 (2) of N.I. Act.
b)
The subject cheque was not issued by the accused
No.3 as he was not the signatory to the said cheque and as
such the cognizance taken by the learned Magistrate in sofar
it relates to accused No.3 is impermissible.
c)
The subje
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.