SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 8632

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.SANDESH, J
SRI. M R MOHAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
NIL – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. SUNIL S. RAO, SRI G.PANDURANGA
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. filing of the appeal against the trial court's order. (Para 1 , 2)
2. claim of probate based on will and property ownership. (Para 3 , 4 , 12)
3. trial court's basis for denying probate. (Para 5 , 6)
4. arguments against the trial court's reasoning. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11)
5. court's reasoning for granting probate despite absence of an executor. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. final determination of allowing the appeal. (Para 16)

JUDGMENT

Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and perused the material on record.

2. This miscellaneous first appeal is filed assailing the order dated 20.04.2023 passed by the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge at Tumakuru in P & S.C.No.25/2022 dismissing the petition filed for issuance of probate.

3. The appellants have sought the probate stating that the petition schedule property belongs to one Sannarangappa and the same was granted to them vide RUC No.34/1978-79 dated 22.11.1978 and thereafter they were enjoying the same and cultivating the same as owners. The said Sannarangappa is unmarried. It is the contention of the appellants that during the life time of said Sannarangappa, the father of the petitioners and the petitioners were loo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top