ORAL ORDER

2. The parties shall henceforth be referred to as they were arrayed before the Trial Court. The petitioners were defendant Nos.6 and 7 while respondent No.1 herein was the plaintiff and respondent Nos.2 to 5 were defendant Nos.2 to 5 respectively, before the Trial Court.

4. Being aggrieved by the same, defendant Nos.6 and 7 are before this Court in this writ petition.

6. Learned counsel for the plaintiff / respondent No.1 on the other hand contended that the application (I.A. No.31) was initially filed at the stage when the suit was set down for evidence. However, the said application was rejected by the Trial Court. Thereafter, this Court in W.P No.5466/2020 granted liberty to the petitioner herein to file a fresh detailed application for amendment of the plaint before the Trial Court and accordingly, the instant application was filed. He contends that the survey number of the land in Appasandra was wrongly assigned to the land in Achatanahalli which was an inadvertent error. He contends that allowing the application (I.A. No.32) fo