Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL, MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T, JJ
SRI YATHISH M – Appellant
Versus
SMT B A INDIRAMMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the property attached and produced (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. having considered the submissions (Para 9) |
| 3. the undisputed facts of case (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL)
Challenging dismissal of his application under Order XXI Rule 58, 101 read with Section 151 of CPC, the third party applicant/objector in Ex.No.45/2019 on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru has preferred this appeal.
2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:
The appellant is the great grandson of one Muniswamappa. For better appreciation of facts of the case, the pedigree of B.M.Muniswamappa is extracted as follows:
3. For the better appreciation, the dates and events of the case are set out as follows:
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 1948 | B.M.Krishnamurthy S/o late Muniswamappa filed O.S.No.15/48-49 against Muniswamappa and other sons seeking partition of joint family properties. Sy.No.15/1 of Beniganahalli village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk measuring 6 acres 15 guntas was one of the suit properties. |
| 02.11.1950 | The parties entered into compromise by filing petition under Order XX |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
