SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 2851

PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI. P RAMAPRASAD – Appellant
Versus
SRI. THYAGARAJ R – Respondent


Heard the petitioner’s counsel and also the counsel

appearing for the respondents.

2. The factual matrix of the case of respondent No.1 before

the Trial Court while filing the suit in O.S.No.231/2019 contend

that, one Nanjareddy had three sons, Ramareddy, Lingareddy

and Munireddy of Agaram Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore. The

said family possessed vast properties in and around Agara

Village and in Bangalore City. There was a family partition

amongst the members of the Nanjareddy Family by virtue of

O.S.No.1/1915-16 on the file of the Court of District Judge at

Bangalore dated 8.10.1923, which got culminated in Final

Decree proceedings vide FDP dated 14.5.1928.

3. In terms of the said proceedings shares of the

respective parties therein were determined and definite shares

were allotted to the parties therein as per the schedule

appended. The plaintiff herein falls in the branch of Munireddy

who had three sons and plaintiff is the grandson of Nanjunda S/o

Munireddy. Late Munireddy got a definite share as per the

5

judgment and decree and FDP proceedings and the said

Munireddy died during the pendency of the suit leaving behind

his three sons without getting an inch in suit schedule p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top