PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI. P RAMAPRASAD – Appellant
Versus
SRI. THYAGARAJ R – Respondent
Heard the petitioner’s counsel and also the counsel
appearing for the respondents.
2. The factual matrix of the case of respondent No.1 before
the Trial Court while filing the suit in O.S.No.231/2019 contend
that, one Nanjareddy had three sons, Ramareddy, Lingareddy
and Munireddy of Agaram Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore. The
said family possessed vast properties in and around Agara
Village and in Bangalore City. There was a family partition
amongst the members of the Nanjareddy Family by virtue of
O.S.No.1/1915-16 on the file of the Court of District Judge at
Bangalore dated 8.10.1923, which got culminated in Final
Decree proceedings vide FDP dated 14.5.1928.
3. In terms of the said proceedings shares of the
respective parties therein were determined and definite shares
were allotted to the parties therein as per the schedule
appended. The plaintiff herein falls in the branch of Munireddy
who had three sons and plaintiff is the grandson of Nanjunda S/o
Munireddy. Late Munireddy got a definite share as per the
5
judgment and decree and FDP proceedings and the said
Munireddy died during the pendency of the suit leaving behind
his three sons without getting an inch in suit schedule p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.