SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 3005

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
SMT PUTTAGANGAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SRI RANGARAJU – Respondent


&

DECREE

DATED

31.10.2006

PASSED

IN

R.A.NO.31/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) &

JMFC, DEVANAHALLI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING

THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED: 15.1.2005 PASSED IN

OS.NO.276/1992 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.)

& JMFC, DEVANAHALLI.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE

COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

3

JUDGMENT

The captioned second appeal is filed by the plaintiffs

feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the Courts

below wherein plaintiff’s suit seeking relief of declaration and

possession is dismissed by both the Courts.

2.

For the sake of brevity, the parties are referred to

as per their rank before the trial Court.

3.

This Court deems it fit to refer to the family tree as

it is relevant for effective adjudication of the controversy

between the parties. The family tree is as under:

Muluvagilu Raju

|

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

|

|

|

|

Puttamma Doddamuniswamy Raju Chikkamuniswamy Raju Narasimharaju

|

|

-----------------------------------------------------

|

|

|

Rangamma Rangaraju

Puttarangamma(Pltf No.1)

(Defendant)

W/o Chikk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top