HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
DR.SHARANYA MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge compulsory service notification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on legislative competence and legality of bonds. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's analysis on legislative power and repugnancy. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER
Conglomeration of these cases call in question (i) notification dated 08-06-2021 whereby every candidate who joins MMBS in Karnataka State under the Government quota and who graduate in the year 2021 will have to undergo compulsory service and will have to execute a compulsory bond as a part of compulsory service in the allotted Government hospitals selected and posted on the basis of merit through a process of counseling and (ii) a corrigendum dated 17-06-2021 issued later, whereby Rule 11 of the Karnataka Selection of Candidates for admission to Government seats in Professional Educational Institutions Rules, 2006 (‘2006 Rules’ for short) comes to be amended, directing all candidates who get admitted to MBBS Course under Government quota in any of the medical colleges run by the Government of Karnataka or Government seats in private medical colleges who have completed MBBS course including internship, shall serve the Government, failing whic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.