HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
SANJEEVA C – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Service of notice to respondent Nos.4 and 5 is dispensed with.
2. The petitioners filed a complaint under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”), and RERA passed an order directing Respondent No.4 to refund the payment made by the petitioners towards their respective unit bookings. Following the order, Respondent No.5 issued a recovery certificate to Respondent No.1 to recover the amount with interest as arrears of land revenue.
3. The petitioners’ grievance is that despite representations made to recover the amount in light of the revenue recovery certificate issued by Respondent No.5, Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 have not taken any steps. Therefore, in similar circumstances, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Errol John Noronha and Others v. State of Karnataka and Others in WP No.6545/2023 directed the revenue authorities to implement the subject K-RERA orders and report compliance to the Registrar General of this Court within an outer limit of three months, failing which, a heavy personal cost may be levied on an appropriate application being moved by the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.