HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ, J
SRI. K. KUBERA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. BUNDAPPA @ BUNDEGOWDA – Respondent
WP 3915/2022
AT ANNEXURE-E DATED 23.12.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.6/2021 BY SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT PANDAVAPURA REJECTING THE APPLICATION, IA NO.2 FILED BY PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 (a) AND (d) CPC READ WITH UNDER ORDER IX RULE 9 AND UNDER ORDER 22 RULE 9 OF CPC BY ISSUE OF A WRIT CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OF DIRECTION AS THE CASE MAYBE AND CONSEQEUNTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION IA NO.2 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. Digitally signed by BS RAVIKUMAR Location:
2. When this Court pointed out to the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition against an order passed on an application filed under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) of CPC is not maintainable, since any order allowing this petition would result in closing of the proceedings before the Trial Court and therefore, only a civil revision petition under Section 115 of CPC is maintainable, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to convert this writ petition to a Civil Revision Petition.
3. Hence, permission is granted to convert this writ petition into a Civil Revision Petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to make appropriate amendments in the writ petition to bring it in line with the format of a Civil Revision Petition as prescribed.
4. For statistical purposes, this petition stands closed.
5. The petitioner is directed to amend the petition within a period of two weeks from today, failing which, the petition shall stand dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.