SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 39611

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR, J
MR. T. MANOHARAN – Appellant
Versus
MR BABANNA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:NARAYANAN M R ,Respondent Advocate: P D SURANA

CAV JUDGMENT

The plaintiff has filed this appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.2422/2017, dated 06.02.2023, by the XXIX Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, thereby, the suit filed for permanent injunction is dismissed and also granted the relief of possession in favour of the defendant directing the plaintiff to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the suit schedule property to defendant.

2. The status of the parties is referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court for easy reference and convenience.

3. Brief facts of the case are as under:

Plaintiff’s case:

a) It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant is running a construction firm in the name and style as P.M.Construction and the plaintiff was working under the defendant from 1996 as Supervisor and also the defendant started business of running and maintaining swimming pool and was appointed as Administrator and was looking all the administration and management of the entire firm established by the defendant.

b) It is further pleaded that the defendant has provided a house at No.115 (old No.2) opposite to Maruti Flour Mill, situated at 1st Cross, 1st Main, Nayanashetty Paly

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top