ORAL ORDER

The Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking for withdrawal of the petition which reads as follows:

"It is submitted that after the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court on 28.09.2022, the 3rd respondent has recommended the case of the petitioner for promotion from attendant to clerk- cum-Data entry operator by virtue of the resolution dated 19.09.2024. It is submitted that in view of the subsequent development in the above matter, the petitioner is withdrawing the present writ petition. Hence this memo may be taken on record and writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity."

2. However, the Registry has raised an office objection to the memo filed by the counsel for the petitioner which reads as hereunder:

"Reg: 1) Rectification of office objections raised in memo for withdrawal of WP filed by adv. for petitioner i.e., signature of the petitioner is not forthcoming in the memo."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner Sri. K. Ravishankar submits that the office objection raised by the Registry would defeat the object and purpose of the duly signed 'Vakalatnama' by the parties authorising the advocates to appear and p