HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
BHARATKUMAR S/O INDURAO RANGOLE – Appellant
Versus
SHARADKUMAR S/O INDURAO RANGOLE – Respondent
This writ petition is directed against the impugned order
dated 02.01.2023 passed on I.A. Nos. 23, 24 and 25 in O.S. No.
124/2017 (old No. 90/2011) on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and
JMFC, Nipani, whereby the said applications filed by the petitioner-
defendant No.1 under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC, Sec. 151 CPC
and Sec. 151 CPC respectively seeking reopening of the case,
recalling of DW1 for further examination-in-chief and for permission
to produce documents, was rejected by the trial Court.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned counsel for respondent No.1 and perused the material on
record including the impugned order. Though notice of this petition
was served on the respondents No. 2, 3, 5 and 6, they have
remained unrepresented. Notice to respondents No. 4 and 7 is
dispensed with at the request of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 not opposed the
petition.
A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the
respondent No.1-plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit for partition
- 4 -
and separate possession of his alleged share in the suit schedule
properties. The petitioner is arrayed as defendant no.1 in the said
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.