SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 15778

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
BHARATKUMAR S/O INDURAO RANGOLE – Appellant
Versus
SHARADKUMAR S/O INDURAO RANGOLE – Respondent


This writ petition is directed against the impugned order

dated 02.01.2023 passed on I.A. Nos. 23, 24 and 25 in O.S. No.

124/2017 (old No. 90/2011) on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and

JMFC, Nipani, whereby the said applications filed by the petitioner-

defendant No.1 under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC, Sec. 151 CPC

and Sec. 151 CPC respectively seeking reopening of the case,

recalling of DW1 for further examination-in-chief and for permission

to produce documents, was rejected by the trial Court.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned counsel for respondent No.1 and perused the material on

record including the impugned order. Though notice of this petition

was served on the respondents No. 2, 3, 5 and 6, they have

remained unrepresented. Notice to respondents No. 4 and 7 is

dispensed with at the request of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 not opposed the

petition.

A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the

respondent No.1-plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit for partition

- 4 -

and separate possession of his alleged share in the suit schedule

properties. The petitioner is arrayed as defendant no.1 in the said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top