This matter is listed for admission today. Heard the

learned counsel for the appellants.

This appeal is filed challenging the judgment and

decree dated 11.09.2017, passed in R.A.No.86/2012, on

the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC,

Sagar.

The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff

before the Trial Court while seeking the relief of permanent

injunction is that in Sy.No.79, 2 acres of land belongs to

the plaintiff. The defendant Nos.1 to 3 are the children of

Bangarashetty

and

defendant

No.4

is

the

wife

of

Bangarashetty. There was an oral partition in the year

1950 and after the partition, the husband of the plaintiff

was cultivating the property. On 01.03.1957, the plaintiff

had purchased the plaint schedule property and the same is

Streedhan and the plaintiff is in possession of the property

- 4 -

as owner. The defendants are not having any right in

respect of the suit schedule property. The defendants

colluded with each other with an intention to knock off the

suit schedule property and that on 25.01.2004, they

interfered with the possession of the plaintiff and hence suit

is filed for the relief of bare injunction.

In

pursuance

of

the

suit

summons,