PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SMT. K. SHANTHA KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
SRI. V. K. BABU – Respondent
The petitioner, defendant No.8 in O.S.No.230/2007
on the file of II Additional Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural
District, Bengaluru (for short, ‘Trial Court’) is before this
Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
challenging
the
order
dated
30.06.2023
allowing
IA.No.1/2023 filed by the respondent No.1/plaintiff under
Order VI Rule 17 of CPC to amend the plaint to include
additional facts and additional prayers including prayer for
possession.
Heard learned
counsel Sri.K.K.Vasanth for
petitioner/defendant No.8 and learned counsel Sri.Rama
Reddy.B.C., for respondent No.1/plaintiff. Perused the writ
petition papers.
Learned
counsel
Sri.K.K.Vasanth
for
petitioner/defendant No.8 would submit that the suit as
filed by respondent No.1/plaintiff was one for permanent
- 4 -
injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with
plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule
property
and
for
permanent
injunction
restraining
defendant Nos.7 and 8 from alienating or creating any
charge over the suit schedule property. After filing of the
written
statement,
respondent
No.1/plaintiff
filed
application for amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC
to include addition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.