Heard the petitioners counsel and also the counsel

appearing for the respondent-State.

2. This is a successive bail petition filed by accused Nos.5

and 6 and these petitioners earlier have approached this Court

by filing Criminal Petition No.10186/2021 and this Court has

rejected the bail petition vide order dated 14.1.2022 and in

paragraph No.6 of the judgment while rejecting the bail petition

made an observation that when the specific allegations are made

3

against these two accused persons that they have inflicted injury

with the handle of the spade as well as wooden stick and taking

note of the factual aspects of bail granted in favour of other

accused persons, which has been referred supra, the allegation

against them is that they assaulted with their hands and the

same is found in column No.17 and when such being the factual

aspects of the case, it cannot be held that the petitioners are

entitled for bail on the ground of parity.

3. Now fresh petition is filed on the ground of parity again

and though made the ground on merits and counsel mainly

contend that similar allegations made against accused No.4 and

he has been granted bail in Criminal Petition No.5511/2022

contending