- 1 -

CRL.RP No. 1008 of 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1008 OF 2021

BETWEEN:

H. VEERANNA,

S/O LATE MAREAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,

RETIRED AP GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE

R/A NO.40/504,

BEHIND OFFICE OF

CONSERVATIVE FOREST,

KURNOOL TOWN,

KURNOOL DISTRICT – 518 006.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI.SHANKARAPPA S., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SMT. JYOTHI,

W/O UDAY KUMAR,

AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,

NATIVE OF KURNOOL TOWN,

R/A NO.1/496, HMT COLONY,

PENUGOONDA TALUK,

ANANTHPURA DISTRICT,

SEEMANDHRA – 510 051.

2.

UDAY KUMAR,

S/O G C VENKATAKRISHNAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

R/A NO.1/496, HMT COLONY,

PENUGOOND TALUK,

ANANTHPUR DISTRICT,

SEEMANDHRA – 510 051.

Digitally

signed by

SUMA

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

- 2 -

CRL.RP No. 1008 of 2021

3.

SUBBARAYADU,

AGED 55 YEARS,

FATHER OF ACCUSSED NO.1,

R/AT HOUSE NO.50/764A,

DEVANAGAR, KURNOOL TOWN,

ANDRA PRADESH – 518 006.

4.

SARVESH,

WORKING AT BANGALORE,

NATIVE OF KURNOOL,

R/A NO.3, 13^TH A MAIN ROAD,

HONGASANDRA BEGUR ROAD,

BANGALORE – 560 068.

5.

STATE OF KARNATAKA,

BY WHITE FIELD POLICE,

REPRESENTED BY SPP,

HIGH COURT COMPLEX,

BANGALORE – 560 001.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.KRISHNA KUMAR K.K., HCGP)

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING

TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 26.08.2020 IN CR.NO.119/2016

BEFORE THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,

BENGALURU RURAL, BENGALURU AND DIRECT THE RECORD THE

SWORN STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER AND WITNESS AND THE

MATTER MAY BE DEALT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE

COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

This petition is challenging the rejection of the protest

petition filed by the petitioner against the acceptance of the 'B'

report. The revision petition against such an order is not

maintainable.

- 3 -

CRL.RP No. 1008 of 2021

2.

Therefore, the office-objection raised regarding

maintainability of this revision petition is upheld and the

revision petition is dismissed as not maintainable.

It is however open for the petitioner to file appropriate

petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to challenge the order

rejecting the protest petition filed by the petitioner.

Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to

file memo of appearance within a period of two weeks from

today.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NR/-

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6