PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI. N. HANUMANTHEGOWDA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. RAJAMMA – Respondent
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the
learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The factual matrix of the case of the respondents
before the Trial Court by filing a suit for redemption prayed the
Court to pass a judgment and decree against the defendants,
directing the defendants No.1 to 4 to receive the mortgage
amount of Rs.1,000/- and to execute the discharged Shara on
original mortgage deed dated 22.9.1969 and deliver the vacant
possession of the suit schedule property to the plaintiffs and
defendants No.5 to 7 and direct the defendant No.8 not to
disburse the compensation amount in respect of the suit
schedule property in favour of the defendants No.1 to 4
pending disposal of the suit.
- 4 -
3. While seeking the said relief in the plaint, the
respondents have made an averments that the husband of first
plaintiff and father of second plaintiff by name Nanjappa was
the absolute owner of the suit schedule property and he was in
possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property and
that on 4.4.1970, the husband of first plaintiff and father of
second plaintiff by name Nanjappa and the husband of
defendant No.5 and father of defendants No.6 and 7 by name
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.