SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 15179

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
JYOTI MULIMANI
RAMCHANDRA S/O KISHANRAO PATRE – Appellant
Versus
GANGAMMA W/O SIDDANNA – Respondent


Sri.Anand Ture., learned counsel for the petitioner and

Sri.Shravankumar Math., learned counsel for the respondent

have appeared in person.

2.

For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be

referred to as per their ranking and status before the Trial

Court.

3.

The brief facts are these:

It is stated that the plaintiff filed a suit for Perpetual

Injunction in O.S.No.293/2022 on the file of IV Addl. Civil

Judge & J.M.F.C., Kalaburagi. An application – I.A.No.I was also

filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC. The Trial Court vide

order dated 17.08.2022 allowed the application and restrained

the defendant, her agents, or representatives under her from

interfering in the construction of the compound wall undertaken

by the plaintiff towards the Western side of the suit property till

the disposal of the suit.

As things stood thus, the plaintiff moved an application –

I.A.No.II under Section 151 of CPC to direct the Circle

Inspector of Police, Station Bazar Police Station, Kalburgi, to

- 3 -

give police protection to him and his family members for

constructing the compound wall in his property and also to

implement the temporary injunction order granted by the

Court. The Trial Cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top