2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 15357
- 1 -
CRL.RP No. 100403 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100403 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
PRADEEP @ PADDA S/O VITTAL KALAL
AGE. 17 YEARS, OCC. WORKING IN MATAN SHOP
REP. BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN
I.E. MOTHER SMT.RENUKA W/O. VITAL KALAL
R/O.NO.443, ISHWARNAGAR, HUGAR PLOT
HUBBALLI-580001.
&PETITIONER
(BY SRI K.M.SHIRALLI, ADVOCATE.)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH RAILWAY POLICE
STATION, HUBBALLI
R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENCH DHARWAD.
2.
R.J. BETSUR S/O JIWAAJI
AGE 65 YEARS,
R/O LAKKAMANAHALLI,
GANDHI NAGAR,
DHARWAD-580004
&RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI RAMESH CHIGARI, HCGP, FOR R.1.)
THIS
CRIMINAL
REVISION
PETITION
IS
FILED
UNDER
SECTION 102 OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE AND PROTECTION
CHILDREN) ACT, 2015, SEEKING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER/
CCWL ON BAIL IN J.C.NO.17/2022, REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 394 OF IPC, ARISING OUT OF
HUBBALLI
RAILWAY
POLICE
STATION
CRIME
NO.17/2022,
REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS
- 2 -
CRL.RP No. 100403 of 2022
394, 302 AND 397 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON
THE FILE OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE BOARD, DHARWAD, ETC.,.
THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
ORDERS ON 03.01.2022, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF
ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This revision petition is filed under section 102 of the
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act,
2015, for enlarging the petitioner/CCWL on bail in
J.C.No.17/2022, registered for the offence punishable
under sections 394, 397 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code,
1860, arising out of Hubballi Railway Police Station Crime
No.17/2022, on the file of Juvenile Justice Board,
Dharwad.
The brief factual aspects leading to the case are
that, on 28.02.2022 at 06.00 p.m. the informant has
lodged a complaint in C.G.District Hospital, Davangere,
alleging that on 23.02.2022 at about 00.20 hours he
boarded Belagavi Bengaluru express Train at Hubballi in
order to go to Bengaluru. It is further alleged that he was
traveling in a general couch and 4-5 passengers were
sleeping in that coach.
- 3 -
3.
It is the further case of the prosecution that
after 15-20 minutes three young boys entered the
compartment, who were speaking in Hindi and Kannada
language and out of them one person i.e., accused No.1
shown knife to the complainant and demanded the
amount. When the informant has refused to give the
amount, the said boy stabbed on his abdomen by the knife
causing bleeding injuries. Then the informant under the
fear handed over Rs.1,300/- cash and Vivo Mobile Phone
worth of Rs.19,800/- to the said person. However the
other passengers have not come to his rescue. When the
train stopped at Yaluvigi Railway Station for crossing, the
said persons got down and went away. When the train
reached
Davanagere
station
at
03.30
a.m.,
the
complainant intimated the Railway Police and they
admitted him to C.J.Hospital, for treatment, and he lodged
the complaint in due course. Subsequently he succumbed
because of the injuries in the hospital.
4.
Initially FIR was registered for the offence
punishable under section 394 of IPC, but subsequently the
- 4 -
offences under section 302 and 397 of IPC were also
incorporated.
5.
Subsequently the Investigating Officer on the
basis of mobile phone, has apprehended the present
petitioner and other two accused. Since the petitioner was
a juvenile offender, he was kept in a remand home and he
moved a bail petition before the Juvenile Justice Board,
Dharwad, which came to be rejected. He has approached
the learned Sessions Judge by filing an appeal, but the
appeal came to be dismissed. Hence he is before this
Court in this revision petition.
6.
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the
learned HCGP for respondent State. Perused the records.
7.
The learned counsel for revision petitioner
would contend that the petitioner is a juvenile offender
and if he is kept in custody, there is every possibility of he
coming in contact with hard core criminals. Further it is
also asserted that there is no specific overtact alleged
against the present petitioner except asserting his
presence and the overtact alleged is against accused No.1
- 5 -
who is in custody and hence he would seek for admitting
the petitioner on bail, subject to any of the conditions to
be imposed by this Court.
8.
Per contra, the learned HCGP would seriously
oppose the bail petition and invite attention of the Court to
the statement of CW.9 and contend that if the petitioner is
enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of petitioner
indulging in similar offences and sought for rejection of the
bail petition.
9.
Having heard the arguments and on perusing
the records it is evident that the said offence is said to
have been committed on 23.02.2022, the complaint was
lodged
on
28.02.2022
and
subsequently
the
injured/informant succumbed because of the injuries. The
offence is said to have been committed in general coach of
a running train bearing No.20654, Belagavi-Bengaluru
express, in between Kundagol and Yaluvigi Railway
Stations.
The
records
further
disclose
that
the
investigation is concluded and charge sheet has been laid
- 6 -
down for the offence punishable under sections 394, 302
and 397 read with section 34 of IPC.
10. On a perusal of th