SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 15369

- 1 -

WP No. 78386 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

WRIT PETITION NO. 78386 OF 2013 (S-RES)

BETWEEN:

SRI.H N BHAJAKKANAVAR

AGE: 45 YEARS,

S/O. LATE NAGAPPA

WORKED AS CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN MUNICIPAL

COUNCIL, SAVANUR,

NOW WORKING AS REVENUE OFFICER (MANAGER)

CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RANEBENNUR

HAVERI DISTRICT.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. H. B. RAJU & A. M. MALI PATIL, ADVOCATE(ABSENT))

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP.BY ITS SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560 001.

2.

THE COMMISSIONER

and DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY

DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION/

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT.,

9TH FLOOR, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

V.V. TOWER, BANGALORE 560 001.

3.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI

J

MAMATHA

Digitally signed

by J MAMATHA

Date:

2023.01.31

11:30:08 +0530

- 2 -

WP No. 78386 of 2013

4.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND

ENQUIRY OFFICER,

HAVERI SUB DIVISION, HAVERI

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. VINAYAK S. KULKARNI, AGA R1 TO R4)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO:

I.

QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER IMPOSING THE

HARSH PUNISHMENT OF REDUCTION TO A TIME

SCALE TO PAY WITH EFFECT FROM 05/04/2013 FOR

A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS BY EXERCISING THE

POWER CONFERRED UNDER RULE 8(v) OF THE

KARNATAKA

CIVIL

SERVICES(CLASSIFICATION

CONTROL AND APPEAL) RULES VIDE THE FINAL

BEARING

NOPN/ENQUIRY/HG/CR/78/2009-

10/445

DATED:05/04/2013

AND

CORRECTED/RECTIFIED ORDER DATED:18/04/2013

ARE PRODUCED HEREWITH FOR KIND PERSUAL OF

THIS

HON'BLE

COURT

AND

MARKED

AS

ANNEXURES-L AND M RESPECTIVELY IN RESPECT

OF PETITIONER IN CONCERNED ARE ILLEGAL,

ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY AND OPPOSE TO

THE

PRINCIPLES

OF

NATURAL

JUSTICE

AND

WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND AND THE SAME

ARE PASSED WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF LAW.

II.

II. DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS RELEASE ALL

CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS FOLLOWING THEREON

ALONG WITH 18% INTEREST AS PRESCRIBED

UNDER LAW.

III.

III. DIRECT THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO DISPOSE

OF THE APPELA PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER

ON 16/05/2013, WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED

AS ANNEXURE-N.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS

DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

- 3 -

ORDER

On 21.10.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the

petitioner. Thereafter the matter was listed on 04.01.2023, on

which day also there was no representation on behalf of the

petitioner. Again when the matter was called on 19.01.2023, there

was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

Since earlier four occasions as there was no representation

on behalf of the petitioner and even today also, when the matter is

called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

Accordingly, as the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting

the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

gab

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top