- 1 -
WP No. 78386 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO. 78386 OF 2013 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI.H N BHAJAKKANAVAR
AGE: 45 YEARS,
S/O. LATE NAGAPPA
WORKED AS CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN MUNICIPAL
COUNCIL, SAVANUR,
NOW WORKING AS REVENUE OFFICER (MANAGER)
CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RANEBENNUR
HAVERI DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. H. B. RAJU & A. M. MALI PATIL, ADVOCATE(ABSENT))
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP.BY ITS SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560 001.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER
and DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY
DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION/
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT.,
9TH FLOOR, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
V.V. TOWER, BANGALORE 560 001.
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI
J
MAMATHA
Digitally signed
by J MAMATHA
Date:
2023.01.31
11:30:08 +0530
- 2 -
WP No. 78386 of 2013
4.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND
ENQUIRY OFFICER,
HAVERI SUB DIVISION, HAVERI
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VINAYAK S. KULKARNI, AGA R1 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO:
I.
QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER IMPOSING THE
HARSH PUNISHMENT OF REDUCTION TO A TIME
SCALE TO PAY WITH EFFECT FROM 05/04/2013 FOR
A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS BY EXERCISING THE
POWER CONFERRED UNDER RULE 8(v) OF THE
KARNATAKA
CIVIL
SERVICES(CLASSIFICATION
CONTROL AND APPEAL) RULES VIDE THE FINAL
BEARING
NOPN/ENQUIRY/HG/CR/78/2009-
10/445
DATED:05/04/2013
AND
CORRECTED/RECTIFIED ORDER DATED:18/04/2013
ARE PRODUCED HEREWITH FOR KIND PERSUAL OF
THIS
HON'BLE
COURT
AND
MARKED
AS
ANNEXURES-L AND M RESPECTIVELY IN RESPECT
OF PETITIONER IN CONCERNED ARE ILLEGAL,
ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY AND OPPOSE TO
THE
PRINCIPLES
OF
NATURAL
JUSTICE
AND
WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND AND THE SAME
ARE PASSED WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF LAW.
II.
II. DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS RELEASE ALL
CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS FOLLOWING THEREON
ALONG WITH 18% INTEREST AS PRESCRIBED
UNDER LAW.
III.
III. DIRECT THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO DISPOSE
OF THE APPELA PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER
ON 16/05/2013, WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED
AS ANNEXURE-N.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
- 3 -
ORDER
On 21.10.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the
petitioner. Thereafter the matter was listed on 04.01.2023, on
which day also there was no representation on behalf of the
petitioner. Again when the matter was called on 19.01.2023, there
was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Since earlier four occasions as there was no representation
on behalf of the petitioner and even today also, when the matter is
called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, as the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting
the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
gab
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.