PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI.K.G.HANUMANTHARAJU @ K.G.H. RAJU – Appellant
Versus
DAYANANDA – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Since this matter is being disposed at the
preliminary stage itself, I do not find any need to issue notice
to the respondent. Hence, notice is dispensed, so also on the
ground that no adverse orders are passed as against the
respondents.
The petitioner herein is none other than the plaintiff
before the trial court in O.S No.227/2011 before the Additional
Civil Judge and JMFC at Doddaballapura.
The suit came to be filed by the plaintiff for
permanent injunction not to dispose the plaintiff from the suits
schedule properties and to restrain the defendants or their
agents or henchmen from dispossessing the plaintiff and
consequently to restrain the defendants from causing damage
to the suit schedule properties and such other order.
- 5 -
It is the contention of plaintiff that pursuant to the
filing of the suit in the year 2011 more specifically, on
05.11.2011, the respondents defendants have been dragging
on the proceedings one way or the other and the trial court is
also not disposing of the matter expeditiously despite more
than a decade has been passed from the date of filing the suit.
It is the contention of the petitioner that he ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.