PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
MR AJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SRI P SHASHIKUMAR – Respondent
This matter was listed for admission and earlier, the
matter was heard in part and today, the matter is listed for
reporting settlement since, there was an earlier move between
the parties with regard to the settlement is concerned but, no
settlement is entered into between the parties and the counsels
have argued the matter on merits.
The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before
the Trial Court is that, this appellant is in permissive possession
of the suit schedule property and though he agreed to quit and
vacate the suit schedule property, he did not vacate the same.
Hence, he was forced to file a suit for permanent injunction and
mandatory injunction. The contents of the plaint is that the
schedule property comprised of a house bearing Door No.1-S-
21-1583 which is shown as schedule ‘B’ property in the plaint.
- 3 -
The defendant was residing in the schedule ‘B’ premises prior
to the execution of sale deed in favour of this plaintiff by way of
permissive occupant under his erstwhile owner. During
execution of the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff, the
defendant had promised him that he would vacate and
handover the schedule ‘B’ premises to the plaintiff with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.