SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 12826

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (DHARWAD BENCH)
JAINULLABIDDIN G KADOLI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


The captioned writ petition is filed by the petitioner

seeking the following reliefs;

a. To remove the rowdy sheeter and modus Operandi

Bureau opened in the name of petitioner by the

respondents. Annexures-A & B.

b. To compensate for violation of fundamental right of

a person for inserting the name inf Rowdy Sheeter

and Modus Operandi Bureau by not adhering to the

mandated provision.

Amongst the other grounds at the time of hearing

and grounds relied in the averment may be

considered as the part of this petition.

Grant such other relief as this Hon’ble Court deems

fit and necessary, in the interest of justice.

The controversy relating to rowdy sheeting and

history sheeting is put to rest by a judgment rendered by

the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Sri

B.S.Prakash Vs. State of Karnataka & others reported

- 3 -

in 2022 (4) KCCR 3648. The coordinate Bench in the

aforesaid reported judgment while supplementing the

existing position of law relating to rowdy sheeting and

history sheeting has laid down the guidelines. Therefore,

the concerned authority has to take action in terms of

prescribed guidelines laid down by Coordinate Bench of

this Court in the case of Sri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top