The captioned writ petition is filed by the petitioner

seeking the following reliefs;

a. To remove the rowdy sheeter and modus Operandi

Bureau opened in the name of petitioner by the

respondents. Annexures-A & B.

b. To compensate for violation of fundamental right of

a person for inserting the name inf Rowdy Sheeter

and Modus Operandi Bureau by not adhering to the

mandated provision.

Amongst the other grounds at the time of hearing

and grounds relied in the averment may be

considered as the part of this petition.

Grant such other relief as this Hon’ble Court deems

fit and necessary, in the interest of justice.

The controversy relating to rowdy sheeting and

history sheeting is put to rest by a judgment rendered by

the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Sri

B.S.Prakash Vs. State of Karnataka & others reported

- 3 -

in 2022 (4) KCCR 3648. The coordinate Bench in the

aforesaid reported judgment while supplementing the

existing position of law relating to rowdy sheeting and

history sheeting has laid down the guidelines. Therefore,

the concerned authority has to take action in terms of

prescribed guidelines laid down by Coordinate Bench of

this Court in the case of Sri B.S.Prakash (supra).

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed

off.

Mandamus is issued to the respondents to

consider the representations at Annexure-A and B and to

take action in terms of guidelines laid down by the

Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Sri

B.S.Prakash (supra) within a period of three months

from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Sd/-

JUDGE

EM

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12