SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 13226

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC:39525

CRL.P No. 10975 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10975 OF 2023

BETWEEN:

SRI ROHITH KEDIA

S/O CHANDRASHEKAR KEDIA

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

R/A D -3/403, PRESTIGE

ACROPOLICE, # 20 HOSURU ROAD

NEXT TO FORUM MALL, ADUGODI

BENGALURU CITY

BENGALURU - 560 030.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI LAKSHMI KANTH G, ADVOCATE FOR

SRI SUNIL KUMAR S, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY WILSON GARDEN TRAFFIC PS

REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT COMPLEX

BANGALORE - 560 001.

2.

SRI SHREEKANTH B N

S/O NAGARAJ B K

AGED 34 YEARS

R/A MF 13/4, GROUND FLOOR

2ND CIRCULAR ROAD

KSIIDC STAFF QUARTERS

NANDHINI LAYOUT

BENGALURU - 560 096.

3.

SRINIVAS N

S/O NARAYANA M

Digitally signed by B

K

MAHENDRAKUMAR

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2023:KHC:39525

CRL.P No. 10975 of 2023

AGED 57 YEARS

R/A #102/2, 1ST CROSS

KANAKANA PALYA 2ND BLOCK

JAYANAGAR

BENGALURU - 560 011.

4.

SMT. PUSHAPALATHA M

W/O SRINIVAS

AGED 46 YEARS

R/A #102/2, 1ST CROSS

KANAKANA PALYA 2ND BLOCK

JAYANAGAR

BENGALURU - 560 011.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI K NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1

SRI RAJANNA .M, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3 & R4)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO

QUASH THE ENTIRE CHARGE SHEET AND THE PROCEEDINGS

THEREON CR.NO.66/2020 FOR OFFENCE P/U/S. 279, 337, 304-

A

OF

IPC

AND

WHICH

IS

NOW

PENDING

ON

THE

METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE TRAFFIC COURT IV BENGALURU

IN C.C.NO.450/2021.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE

COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

The petitioner is sought to be prosecuted for the

offences punishable under Sections 304A, 337 and 279 of

IPC and Section 185 of the Indian Motor Vehicles Act.

- 3 -

Case of the prosecution is that, due to the rash and

negligent driving by the petitioner, the child of the

respondent Nos.3 and 4 succumbed to injuries.

The parties are present before this Court and have

filed an application under Section 320 r/w Section 482 of

Cr.P.C for compounding of the offences stating that they

have amicably resolved the dispute. In terms of the

settlement, the petitioner has agreed to pay a sum of

Rs.10,00,000/- in addition to the compensation of

Rs.25,00,000/- awarded by the M.A.C.T concerned in

M.V.C.No.1755/2021 and the respondent Nos.2 to 4 who

are the legal representatives of the deceased child have no

objection for quashing the impugned proceedings.

Learned High Court Government Pleader for the

respondent - State would submit that the offence

punishable under Section 304A of IPC is cognizable and

the same cannot be compounded.

- 4 -

5.

The offence punishable under Section 304A of IPC is

punishable with two years imprisonment or with fine or

with both. The respondent Nos.3 and 4 who are the legal

representatives

of

the

deceased

child

have

been

compensated suitably, in all a sum of Rs.35,00,000/-.

6.

Learned counsel for the parties have placed on

record the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at

Bombay in Crl.P.No.3163/2023, by which, in an identical

circumstances, the F.I.R registered against the driver of

the vehicle was quashed, in view of the settlement arrived

at between the parties and the legal representatives of the

deceased have been suitably compensated. Therefore,

having regard to the fact that the legal representatives of

the deceased have been suitably compensated and also

having regard to the fact that the offence punishable

under Section 304 of IPC is punishable with two years

imprisonment or fine or with both, it would not sub-serve

the ends of justice and secure the ends of justice to the

legal representatives of the deceased child, if the criminal

- 5 -

proceedings are allowed to continue. Accordingly,

I proceed to pass the following;

ORDER

(i) The criminal petition is allowed.

(ii) The impugned proceedings in C.C.No.450/2021

on the file of Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic

Court-IV, Bengaluru stands quashed.

Sri.Rajanna M, learned counsel files power on behalf

of respondent Nos.2 to 4.

Sd/-

JUDGE

GH

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top