SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 13226

PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI ROHITH KEDIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


The petitioner is sought to be prosecuted for the

offences punishable under Sections 304A, 337 and 279 of

IPC and Section 185 of the Indian Motor Vehicles Act.

- 3 -

Case of the prosecution is that, due to the rash and

negligent driving by the petitioner, the child of the

respondent Nos.3 and 4 succumbed to injuries.

The parties are present before this Court and have

filed an application under Section 320 r/w Section 482 of

Cr.P.C for compounding of the offences stating that they

have amicably resolved the dispute. In terms of the

settlement, the petitioner has agreed to pay a sum of

Rs.10,00,000/- in addition to the compensation of

Rs.25,00,000/- awarded by the M.A.C.T concerned in

M.V.C.No.1755/2021 and the respondent Nos.2 to 4 who

are the legal representatives of the deceased child have no

objection for quashing the impugned proceedings.

Learned High Court Government Pleader for the

respondent - State would submit that the offence

punishable under Section 304A of IPC is cognizable and

the same cannot be compounded.

- 4 -

5.

The offence punishable under Section 304A of IPC is

punishable with two years imprisonment or with fine or

with both. The respondent Nos.3 and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top