PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI ROHITH KEDIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
The petitioner is sought to be prosecuted for the
offences punishable under Sections 304A, 337 and 279 of
IPC and Section 185 of the Indian Motor Vehicles Act.
- 3 -
Case of the prosecution is that, due to the rash and
negligent driving by the petitioner, the child of the
respondent Nos.3 and 4 succumbed to injuries.
The parties are present before this Court and have
filed an application under Section 320 r/w Section 482 of
Cr.P.C for compounding of the offences stating that they
have amicably resolved the dispute. In terms of the
settlement, the petitioner has agreed to pay a sum of
Rs.10,00,000/- in addition to the compensation of
Rs.25,00,000/- awarded by the M.A.C.T concerned in
M.V.C.No.1755/2021 and the respondent Nos.2 to 4 who
are the legal representatives of the deceased child have no
objection for quashing the impugned proceedings.
Learned High Court Government Pleader for the
respondent - State would submit that the offence
punishable under Section 304A of IPC is cognizable and
the same cannot be compounded.
- 4 -
5.
The offence punishable under Section 304A of IPC is
punishable with two years imprisonment or with fine or
with both. The respondent Nos.3 and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.