Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
NARAYANAMURTHY S/O LATE M.K. MUNISWAMY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court discusses the process of quashing criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts surrounding property sale and payment are presented. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. legal arguments opposing the claims of fraud are discussed. (Para 6) |
| 4. court reiterates that civil matters must remain distinct from criminal proceedings. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. conclusion to quash the fir based on found merits. (Para 14) |
ORDER
1. Accused nos.1 to 5, 7 to 10 and 12 to 14 have filed these two criminal petitions under Section 482 Cr.PC with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings in Crime No.67/2023 arising out of PCR No.1335/2023 pending before the Court of IV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 419, 465, 468, 471, 120B IPC.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
3. Respondent no.2/complainant herein has filed a private complaint in PCR.No.1335/2023 before the IV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, against the petitioners herein and two others alleging that the complainant and his estranged wife had decided to dispose of their joint property and accused no.4 who is the father-in-law of the co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
