Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
C.M. POONACHA, J
SUHANABHANU – Appellant
Versus
H. M. MALLESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the initial responsibility and representation of parties involved in the claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the contestations and arguments raised by the insurer regarding accident occurrence and driver's license. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. clarification of the accident date and evidence supporting the claimant's version. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final decision on compensation enhancement and reassessment of injury claims. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred as per their rank before the Tribunal.
4. The claimant examined himself as PW.1 and a Doctor was examined as CW.2 on commission. Exs.P1 to P19 and C1 to C4 were marked in evidence. The representative of the insurer was examined as RW.1 Exs.R1 to R8 were marked in evidence. The Tribunal by its judgment and award dated 05.03.2012 allowed the claim petition and awarded a sum of `1,14,500/- together with interest @ 8% per annum and directed the 2nd Respondent – Insurer to pay the compensation awarded. Being aggrieved, the present appeals are filed.
Hence, he seeks for allowing of the appeal filed by the insurer.
7. The submissions of the learned counsels have been considered and the m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
