Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR PRADEEP SINGH YERUR, J
MRS. JANAKI K. SHETTIGAR – Appellant
Versus
MR. CLEMENT D’COSTA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. fact summary regarding the deceased and the accident. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. argument regarding inadequate compensation. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's assessment of compensation and legal standards. (Para 14 , 15 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. final decision and compensation adjustment. (Para 21 , 22 , 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT
2. Though this matter is listed for Admission, with consent of both the learned counsels, matter is taken up for final disposal.
4. Brief facts of the case are as under :
5. Due to the said accident deceased Chandrakanth. K. sustained grievous injuries all over the body and he was immediately shifted to KMC Hospital for treatment,. He was inpatient upto 09.07.2011, but despite sincere efforts of the doctor he succumbed to the injuries. The claimant spent huge amount towards medical and treatment of her son deceased Chandrakanth. K.
7. On service of notice, respondent Nos.1 and 2 entered appearance and filed their respective objections. Respondent No.1 – Owner of the offending vehicle denied the age, occupation and income of the deceased, but he contended that the compensation claimed is highly excessive, exorbitant and wit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
