IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 833/2019
BETWEEN:
SRI G.K. VENKATESH
S/O LATE KANNAN
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
R/AT NO.354, 10TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMILAYOUT
BENGALURU – 560 086.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI G.R. MOHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI KEMPARAJ C.D.,
S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAYA
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
R/AT NO.86/A, 4TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMILAYOUT
BENGALURU – 560 086.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. GEETHADEVI M.P., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT DATED 13.06.2019 IN CRL.A.NO.1979/2018 ON THE
FILE OF LX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BANGALORE (CCH-61) AND ORDER OF C.C.NO.73/2017 DATED
05.09.2018 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX A.C.M.M., BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
- 2 -
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, Sri.G.K.Venkatesh, filed a criminal revision petition against the respondent, Sri.C.D.Kemparaj, for dishonoring a cheque for Rs. 6,00,000/- under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the criminal revision petition and acquitted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, as the parties had resolved the dispute through an amicable settlement.
Issues: Whether the parties can settle a compoundable offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act at any stage.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act is compoundable and the parties can settle the matter at any stage.
Final Decision: The court allowed the criminal revision petition and acquitted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
The petitioner-Sri.G.K.Venkatesh and his counsel
Sri.G.R.Mohan, and the respondent-Sri.C.D.Kemparaj and
his counsel Smt.Geethadevi M.P are present.
2.
It appears from the record that on 04.01.2023,
a joint memo has been filed by the parties stating that
they have resolved the dispute by amicable settlement.
The said settlement and its terms, as stated in para Nos.2,
3, 4 and 5 of the joint memo are extracted below:
"2.
During the pendency of the above
appeal, the Petitioner and the Respondent have
amicably resolved the matter wherein the
Petitioner herein has agreed to pay the entire
dishonored Cheque Amount of Rs. 6,00,000/-
to the Respondent and both of them have
agreed to pay the fine amount that is payable
to this Hon'ble Court. The Respondent has
agreed to contribute a sum of Rs. 40,000/-
towards the fine and the Petitioner may deduct
the amount of Rs. 40,000/- and pay him a sum
of Rs. 5,60,000/- (Five lakhs sixty thousand
only).
3.
The Petitioner has deposited a
sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- (three lakhs only) before
- 3 -
the Trail Court and the Petitioner further pay a
balance amount of Rs.2,60,000 by way of
Bankers Cheque dated 02/01/2023 drawn in
favour of the Respondent, DD No - 284870,
Punjab National Bank towards full amount final
settlement.
4.
The
Respondent
has
filed
an
application to withdraw the amount of Rs three
lakhs and the Petitioner has no objections for
the Respondent to withdraw the said amount.
5.
The Petitioner further submits that
a sum of Rs.90,000/- by way of Demand Draft
will be deposited before this Hon'ble Court
towards the cost, on or before 03-02-2023.”
3. Today, the petitioner has handed over the
banker’s cheque bearing No.284870 dated 02.01.2023 for
a sum of Rs.2,60,000/- and the same is acknowledged by
the respondent . Thus, in view of the above said joint
memo and as per the averments made in the application-
I.A No.2/2022, there is no embargo to allow the
application-I.A No.2/2022, by encouraging the settlement
arrived at between the parties. It is to be noted here that,
the alleged offence under section 138 of the Negotiable
- 4 -
Instrument Act is a compoundable offence. The parties
can settle the matter at any stage.
Hence, accepting the joint memo, the Criminal
Revision Petition filed by the petitioner stands allowed.
The accused is acquitted under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instrument Act.
The liberty is reserved for the respondent to file the
necessary application before the Trial Court for releasing
the amount, to be deposited by the petitioner/accused and
direct the Trial Court to release the amount in favour of
the respondent after proper identification.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SMC/UN
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.